In the mean time my search for solutions continues.
So, what IS ideal? That varies from person to person, but they are, from most important:
- Sounds great
- $500 or less.
- Battery operated (i.e. portable)
- Supports 128 GBytes or more
- Support for Tidal music streaming
- Nice if it can double as desktop DAC/amp
Pono PMP | Oppo HA-1 | Fiio X5II | Fiio X7 | EchoBox Explorer | UFO | |
Type | DAP | USB DAC/Amp | DAP/Usb | DAP/Usb | DAP | USB DAC/Amp |
Approx. Cost | $399 | $1,200 | $299 | $650 | $449 | $430 |
Portable | Yes | No | Yes | Yes | Yes | No |
Maximum Storage | 192 | N/A | 256 | 192 | 1 Micro SD Slot?? | N/A |
Sound Quality | Excellent | Sadistic | Sadistic-ish | ??? | ??? | Very very good |
Wi Fi Tidal | No | N/A | No | Yes | Yes | N/A |
DAC | ESS | ESS | Burr Brown | ESS | Burr Brown | ??? |
Pono
As I have written before, the sound of the Pono Portable Music Player, regardless of headphones, is always excellent, musical and enjoyable. It handled both my AKG and Shure IEM's so convincingly and smoothly that is has been my reference standard for what a portable Digital Audio Player (DAP) should be. However it is hampered by a few things which have kept me from pulling the plug on one for myself: Size, features and storage.The size is too chunky, the apps are non-existant and storage is limited to about 192 GBytes. There's no way to stream music from a NAS or online service. If it had BluTooth connectivity (and BluTooth could do high resolution music) so I can play from my phone it would be hands down unbeatable.
UFO DSD DAC
Oppo HA-1

Then I come to this "thing" released by Oppo as the HA-1. Are they serious, or just being cynical? I can't tell really. What a hard, strident and difficult to listen to treble and limp sounding bass. I heard it at the 2015 California Audio Show, the same show where I heard the UFO DSD DAC, driven by a Macbook Air. It was literally the worst sound at the entire show, of any kind, and I heard some really bad rooms and bad music at that show. I thought perhaps it was me but I mentioned this to a fellow audiophile who owned one for about two months who described it as "fingernails on a chalkboard." It's a real shame because it's beefy, sexy and comes from a company I really appreciate for it's high quality products and connection to consumers. Perhaps it performs much better with their own headphones? I never found out. For about a third of the price, the UFO DSD DAC easily sounds better and takes up less space.
Fiio X5II (2nd Generation)
The Fiio X5II is an extremely well reviewed player that is now in it's second generation, as well as heavily discounted from it's original $500 to around $300. With the glowing and numerous consumer reviews, and Fiio, like Oppo, showing very good customer engagement, I was certain this would be a good player for my commute. Unfortunately, cold and alone it's barely listenable. The treble is such an ear drill it literally makes them feel hot after twenty to thirty minutes of listening. It's like when you've been out in the sun too long and your eyes ache? Imagine that in my ears. It's not hyperbole, it's exactly what it feels like. By itself I really can't recommend this player. The closest experience I've had to this is the Oppo HD-1, or speakers from Triangle. Ouch. Not all is lost however for with an outboard amplifier this is a very good source.Fiio X5II/K5 Combination
I have also recently reviewed the Fiio E12A Mont Blanc Edition portable amplifier, which also does an admirable job of driving difficult headphones from the X5II. If you are only looking for a portable solution, that may be your dream ticket.
EchoBox Explorer
Sadly I've never seen one in real life so cannot comment except to say they look very interesting!
Lessons Learned
I. The resolution of the playback files is much less important than the sound of the player.I'm not saying crappy MP3 files sound as good as everything else. What I am saying is that the sound quality and balance of the player is a much bigger factor to my enjoyment of the music than the file resolution. This may not be true in my home system, but it is here. I would much rather have the Pono sound at 44.1kHz/16 bit FLAC than the Oppo at any file quality.
II. Online audio reviews, even when apparently independent, are often completely off the mark.
III. DAC chip makers don't matter as much as the amplifiers.Some audiophiles ascribe to the idea that DAC chips from manufacturer X are always better than Y, but putting together this report and going over my past experiences I can't agree with that at all. I've listened to ESS and Burr Brown devices and have found great and bad examples of both. My current and previous home DAC's had Burr Brown chips in them. The Pono uses an ESS chip. The X5 uses Burr Brown. The Oppo 103 uses Cirrus Logic. There's no correlation in my experience that either chip is inherently better or worse.
I'll write more on this as I gain more experience. As always, please for the sake of the Dark Goddess of Coffee and Chocolate I worship, use your own ears to spend your own money. Buy what you like, always.
No comments:
Post a Comment